<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">economics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник РГГУ. Серия "Экономика и управление"</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-6304</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.28995/2073-6304-2021-2-62-80</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">economics-299</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Устойчивость макроэкономической динамики: система показателей и методика оценки</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sustainability of macroeconomic dynamics. System of indicators and assessment technique</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Глазунова</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Glazunova</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Вильгельмина В. Глазунова, кандидат экономических наук, старший научный сотрудник</p><p>117218,  Москва, Нахимовский проспект, д. 32</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vil’gel’mina V. Glazunova, Cand. of Sci. (Economics), senior researcher</p><p> bld. 32, Nakhimovskii Avenue, Moscow, 117218</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">wilhelminaglazunova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт экономики Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>07</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Глазунова В.В., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Глазунова В.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Glazunova V.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/299">https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/299</self-uri><abstract><p>В рамках интеграционных образований различные страны показывают отличную макроэкономическую динамику, которая по идее должна детерминироваться формой интеграции, экономического союза, но зависит также от многих иных факторов и условий, связанных с конкретной страной. Тем самым стандартное сопоставление динамики по избранным для этого показателям становится недостаточным, поскольку отличается качество этой динамики, выявление которого полезно с точки зрения дальнейшего развития экономического Союза стран. В связи с этим целью настоящего исследования выступает формирование и применение методики оценки устойчивости макроэкономической динамики, измеряемой по темпу роста ВВП на примере стран Евразийского экономического союза. Методологию исследования составляет эмпирический и структурный анализа, метод построения фазовых портретов Ф. Такенса, позволяющий по свойствам аттрактора определять степень устойчивости динамики на выбранном интервале времени. Этот метод является одним из шагов алгоритма предлагаемой методики оценки устойчивости макроэкономической динамики. Кроме того, предлагается минимально необходимая система показателей для характеристики развития стран – участниц Евразийского экономического союза. Результатом исследования в прикладном значении стала оценка устойчивости макроэкономической динамики по темпу роста ВВП стран Евразийского союза, сравнительный анализ динамики. Применение методики оценки устойчивости позволяет включить ее в классический вариант макроэкономического анализа развития экономики, получив выводы относительно устойчивости роста, с перспективой определения факторов, обеспечивающих такую динамику, а также инструментов экономической политики, способных повлиять на динамику ВВП по его компонентам и секторам с тем, чтобы повысить устойчивость роста. Из стран Евразийского союза только Казахстан показывает на всем интервале времени положительный темп роста, хотя его колебания весьма значительны. Оценка устойчивости закономерно приводит к выяснению причин различий по этому параметру динамики, что представляет собой перспективную научную задачу, требующую своего решения. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p> Within the framework of integration formations, various countries show excellent macroeconomic dynamics, which in theory should be determined by the form of integration, economic union, but also depends on many other factors and conditions associated with a particular country. Thus, the standard comparison of the dynamics according to the indicators chosen for that becomes insufficient, because of difference in the quality of that dynamics which revealng is useful from the point of view of the further development of the economic Union of countries. Thereby the purpose of the study is the formation and application of a methodology for assessing the stability of macroeconomic dynamics, measured by the rate of GDP growth using the example of the Eurasian Economic Union countries. The research methodology is an empirical and structural analysis, a method for constructing phase portraits by F. Takens, which allows defining the degree of stability of dynamics on a selected time interval by the properties of an attractor. The method is a step in the algorithm of the proposed methodology for assessing the stability of macroeconomic dynamics. In addition, the author proposes the minimum necessary system of indicators required to characterize the development of the countries – members of the Eurasian Economic Union. The result of the study in the applied sense was an assessment of the stability of macroeconomic dynamics by the GDP growth rate of the Eurasian Union countries, a comparative analysis of the dynamics. The use of the sustainability assessment methodology allows it to be included in the classic version of the macroeconomic analysis of economic development, having obtained conclusions regarding the sustainability of growth, with the prospect of determining the factors that ensure such dynamics, as well as the economic policy instruments that can affect the dynamics of GDP by its components and sectors in order to improve the sustainability of growth. of the countries of the Eurasian Union, only Kazakhstan shows a positive growth rate over the entire time interval, although its fluctuations are quite significant. The assessment of stability naturally leads to the elucidation of the reasons for the differences in that parameter of dynamics, which is a promising scientific problem that requires its solution. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>макроэкономическая динамика</kwd><kwd>устойчивость</kwd><kwd>показатели динамики</kwd><kwd>методика оценки устойчивости</kwd><kwd>метод фазовых портретов</kwd><kwd>страны Евразийского экономического союза</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>macroeconomic dynamics</kwd><kwd>sustainability</kwd><kwd>dynamics indicators</kwd><kwd>methods for assessing sustainability</kwd><kwd>method of phase portraits</kwd><kwd>countries of the Eurasian Economic Union</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агеев 2019 – Агеев А.И. Россия в мировых глобальных процессах и ее присутствие в международных организациях // Мужская работа. 2019. № 70. С. 15–21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ageev, A.I. (2019), “Russia in world global processes and its presence in international organizations”, Muzhskaya rabota, no. 70, pp. 15–21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агеев, Логинов, Занузданный 2015 – Агеев А.И., Логинов Е.Л., Занузданный Е.Н. Евразийский экономический союз: необходимость нового контура стратегического управления // Экономические стратегии. 2015. № 4. С. 28–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ageev, A.I., Loginov, E.L. and Zanuzdannyi, E.N, (2015), “Eurasian Economic Union. The need for a new contour of strategic management”, Economic strategies, no. 4, pp. 28–36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брур, Дюмортье, Стрин, Такенс 2003 – Брур Х.В., Дюмортье Ф., Стрин С., Такенс Ф. Структуры в динамике. Конечномерные детерминированные системы. М.: Ин-т компьютерных исследований, 2003. 336 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bayramov, V, Breban, D. and Mukhtarov, E. (2019), “Economic effects estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of regional linear regression”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, no. 52 (3), pp. 209–225.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазунова 2020a – Глазунова В.В. Сравнительный анализ структурной динамики экономики некоторых стран и ее устойчивости // Вестник Южно-российского государственного технического университета (НПИ). Серия: социально-экономические науки. 2020. № 13 (3). С. 27–37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Broеr, H.W., Dumortier, F., van Strien, S.J. and Takens, F. (2003), Struktury v dinamike. Konechnomernye determinirovannye sistemy [Structures in dynamics. Finite dimensional deterministic studies], Institut komp’yuternykh issledovanii, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазунова 2020b – Глазунова В.В. Метод фазовых портретов в оценке устойчивости динамики экономических систем // Анализ, моделирование, управление, развитие социально-экономических систем: XIV Всероссийская с международным участием школа-симпозиум: Сборник научных трудов. Симферополь: КГУ, 2020. С. 107–108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galiakberov, A. and Abdullin, A. (2014), “Theory and practice of regional integration based on the EurAsEC model (Russian point of view)”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 5 (2), pp. 116–121.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазунова 2019 – Глазунова В.В. Сравнительный анализ устойчивости экономической динамики некоторых стран // Сила систем. 2019. № 4 (13). С. 24–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazunova, V.V. (2020a), “Comparative analysis of the structural dynamics in the economy of some countries and its stability”, Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI), Series: socio-economic sciences, no. 13 (3), pp. 27–37.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малинецкий, Потапов, Подлазов 2015 – Малинецкий Г.Г, Потапов А.Б., Подлазов А.В. Нелинейная динамика: Подходы, результаты, надежды. М.: URSS, 2015. 280 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazunova, V.V. (2020b), “The method of phase portraits in assessing the dynamics stability in economic systems”, Analiz, modelirovanie, upravlenie, razvitie sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: XIV Vserossiiskaya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem shkola-simpozium: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Analysis, modeling, management, development of socio-economic systems. XIV All-Russian school-symposium with international participation. Collection of scientific works], KSU, Simferopol, pp. 107–108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухарев 2020 – Сухарев О.С. Структура экономического роста стран Евразийского Союза // Экономические стратегии. 2020. № 2. С. 112–123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazunova, V.V. (2019), “Comparative analysis of the stability of the economic dynamics in some countries”, Sila sistem, no. 4 (13), pp. 24–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухарев 2016 – Сухарев О.С. Экономика глобального эксцесса. М.: Ленанд, 2016. 512 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gurova, I.P., Platonova, I.N. and Maksakova, M.A. (2018), “The Level of Trade Integration in the Eurasian Economic Union”, Studies on Russian Economic Development, vol. 29, pp. 447–453.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bayramov, Breban, Mukhtarov 2019 – Bayramov V., Breban D., Mukhtarov E. Econo mic effects estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of regional linear regression // Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2019. № 52 (3). P. 209–225.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hale, H.E. (2010), “Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of Putin’s Russia”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 1 (1), pp. 33–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galiakberov, Abdullin 2014 – Galiakberov A, Abdullin A. Theory and practice of regional integration based on the EurAsEC model (Russian point of view) // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2014. № 5 (2). P. 116–121.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hartwell, C.A. (2013), “A Eurasian (or a Soviet) Union? Consequences of further economic integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States”, Business Horizons, no. 56 (4), pp. 411–420.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gurova, Platonova, Maksakova 2018 – Gurova I.P., Platonova I.N., Maksakova M.A. The Level of Trade Integration in the Eurasian Economic Union // Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2018. № 29. P. 447–453.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khitakhunov, A., Mukhamediev, B., and Pomfret, R. (2017), “Eurasian Economic Union. Present and future perspectives”, Economic Change and Restructuring, vol. 50, pp. 59–77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hale 2010 – Hale H.E. Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of Putin’s Russia // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2010. № 1 (1). P. 33–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malinetskii, G.G., Potapov, A.B. and Podlazov, A.V. (2015), Nelineinaya dinamika: Podhodi, rezultati, nadezhdi [Nonlinear Dynamics. Approaches, Results, Expectations], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hartwell 2013 – Hartwell C.A. A Eurasian (or a Soviet) Union? Consequences of further economic integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States // Business Horizons. 2013. № 56 (4). P. 411–420.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mostafa, G. (2013), “The concept of ‘Eurasia’. Kazakhstan’s Eurasian policy and its implications”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 4 (2), pp. 160–170.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khitakhunov, Mukhamediyev, Pomfret 2017 – Khitakhunov A, Mukhamediyev B, Pomfret R. Eurasian Economic Union: present and future perspectives // Economic Change and Restructuring. 2017. № 50. P. 59–77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mostafa, G. and Mahmood, M. (2018), “Eurasian Economic Union. Evolution, challenges and possible future directions”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 9 (2), pp. 163–172.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mostafa 2013 – Mostafa G. The concept of ‘Eurasia’: Kazakhstan’s Eurasian policy and its implications // Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2013. № 4 (2). P. 160–170.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pak, o. (2019), “The impact of state ownership and business models on bank stability: Empirical evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 71. pp. 161–175.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mostafa, Mahmood 2018 – Mostafa G., Mahmood M. Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future directions // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. № 9 (2) P. 163–172.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Patalakh, A. (2018), “Economic or Geopolitical? Explaining the Motives and Expectations of the Eurasian Economic Union’s Member States”, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, no. 11, pp. 31–48.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pak 2019 – Pak O. The impact of state ownership and business models on bank stability: Empirical evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union // The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2019. № 71. P. 161–175.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukharev, o.S. (2020), “The structure of economic growth in the countries of the Eurasian Union”, Economic strategies, no. 2, pp. 112–123.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patalakh 2018 – Patalakh A. Economic or Geopolitical? Explaining the Motives and Expectations of the Eurasian Economic Union’s Member States // Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018. № 11. P. 31–48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukharev, o.S. (2016), Ekonomika global’nogo ekstsessa [The economy of global kurtosis], Lenand, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
