Ensuring the technological sovereignty of the state in the context of digital transformation
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2025-1-69-81
Abstract
The article outlines the role of digital sovereignty in national security of the state. The relevance of its formation and maintenance is due to the intensive speed of global digital transformation. Studying the structure and content of digital sovereignty is an extremely important task in conditions of instability in the macroeconomic environment. The constant increase in the volume of information and generated data and the necessity of its protection creates new difficulties and threats in matters of information security. The work identifies the main components of digital sovereignty, the key ones are the data sovereignty and technological sovereignty. The concept and features of “technological sovereignty”, modern approaches to its development are analyzed, and the need for their practical implementation is substantiated .both at the state level and at the level of business processes participants. The main objective is to provide an integrated approach to the issue in compliance with basic principles, among which regulatedness, clarity, openness, simplicity and compatibility come to the fore. Research shows that the level of technological independence in Russia is gradually increasing. It is a consequence of active support from the government which was intensified due to the current political situation and sanctions pressure on Russian business; an increase in the index of output of goods and services for basic types is the best confirmation that those measures are effective.
About the Author
N. M. GasanovaRussian Federation
Naida M. Gasanova, Cand. of Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor,
bld. 70, Imam Shamil Avenue, Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan, Russia, 367026.
References
1. Afanasyev, A.A. (2023), “Technological sovereignty: variant approaches”, Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 689–706.
2. Antonov, D.E. (2022), “Digital sovereignty of the modern state: from control to communication”, Polylogos, vol. 6. no. 2 (20), available at: https://polylogos-journal.ru/s258770110020356-3-1 (Accessed 14 May 2024).
3. Couture, S. and Toupin, S. (2019), “What does the notion of ‘sovereignty’ mean when referring to the digital?”, Bulletin of International Organizations, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 48–69.
4. Dunenkova, E.N. and Onishchenko S.I. (2023), “Technological sovereignty of Russia: innovative development of industries”, Innovation and investment, no. 4, pp. 15–18.
5. Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., Reiss, T., Roth, F., Schubert, T., Schuler J. and Walz, R. (2020), “Technology sovereignty. From demand to concept, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research”, Policy Brief, no. 2.
6. Edler, J., Blind K., Kroll, H. and Schubert, T. (2023), “Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means”, Research Policy, vol. 52, iss. 6.
7. Fabiano, N. (2020), “Digital Sovereignty Between ‘Accountability’ and the Value of Personal Data”, Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, no. 5 (3), pp. 270–274.
8. Karavaeva, I.V. and Lev, M.Yu. (2023), “Economic security: technological sovereignty in the system of economic security in modern Russia”, Economic Security, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 905–924.
9. Lopatova, N.G. (2022), “Digital sovereignty in the national security system: theoretical and methodological aspects”, Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of NAS of Belarus, no. 5, pp. 40–48.
10. Robles-Carrillo, M. (2023), “Sovereignty vs. Digital Sovereignty”, Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, no. 1 (3), pp. 673–690.
11. Salmanova, I.P. and Samoshkina, M.V. (2023), “An integrated approach to the economic security ensuring of enterprises in modern conditions”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin.
12. “Economics. Management. Law” Series, no. 3, pp. 39–49, DOI: 10.28995/20736304-2023-3-39-49.
13. Sekerin, V.D., Efremov, A.A., and Semenova, V.V. (2023), “Actual problems of formation of innovative infrastructure of Russian industrial enterprises”, Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Economics, no. 1, pp. 71–79.
14. Sopilko, N.Yu. and Myasnikova, O.Yu. (2021), “The main trends of digital transformation in the economy of the EAEU countries”, Issues of Regional Economy, no. 2 (47), pp. 207–213.
15. Sukharev, O.S. (2024), “Technological sovereignty of Russia: formation on the basis of the development of the ‘knowledge economy’ sector”, The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 1, pp. 47–64. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_47_64.
16. Volodenkov, S.V. (2020), “The phenomenon of contemporary state’s digital sovereignty in the context of global technological transformations: content and features”, Journal of Political Research, no. 4. pp. 3–11.
17. Yankovskaya, E.S. (2023), “Digitalization and technological sovereignty of Russia”, Scientific Letters of Russian Customs Academy St. Petersburg branch named after Vladimir Bobko, no. 1 (85), pp. 81–85.
Review
For citations:
Gasanova N.M. Ensuring the technological sovereignty of the state in the context of digital transformation. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2025;(1):69-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2025-1-69-81