Refusal of inheritance as a form of abuse of right
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2025-1-116-125
Abstract
The article considers the issues of the abuse of right when considering the good faith of refusal of inheritance. Any action of a citizen that entails the acceptance of an inheritance by other persons is often qualified as dishonest behavior. Abuse of law is also often applied by the courts as a basis for recognizing the refusal of inheritance as an invalid transaction. Refusal of inheritance, by its legal nature, is a one-sided transaction, and therefore cannot be contested, for example, under bankruptcy law, since it does not provide for the automatic transfer of ownership to another person. Inheritance in general should take precedence over debt obligations, even in relation to bankruptcy creditors. The opening of an inheritance is an unplanned event that is not counted on when opening bankruptcy proceedings. If there is dishonest intent, for example, a potential testator can always, with the help of a will, preemptively exclude a debt-ridden heir by law from inheriting. Refusal of inheritance should be recognized as abuse only if there are clear signs of dishonesty, for example, when the debtor continues to use the property or gives orders to the heirs about it. At the moment, especially when considering refusal of inheritance in bankruptcy, the presumption of bad faith of the heir dominates, which is not correct. Failure to accept an inheritance, which, as an omission, is not a transaction on general grounds, is also considered invalid in bankruptcy proceedings, which is an incorrect interpretation of the law. Unfair omission is an abuse of right.
About the Author
D. M. KasatkinRussian Federation
Dmitrii M. Kasatkin,
bld. 4, 2nd Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 190005.
References
1. Bartkova, O.G. (2020), “Review of legal positions of the supreme court of the Russian Federation for 2015–2020 on the application of the provisions of the civil code of the Russian Federation on the invalidity of transactions and on the prohibition of abuse of rights”, Vestnik оf Tver State University. Series: Law, no. 3 (63), pp. 7–15.
2. Berdegulova, L.A. (2023), “Actual issues of the realization of hereditary rights by a bankrupt citizen”, Scientific Works of Orenburg Institute (Branch) of MSLA, no. 3 (57), pp. 49–54.
3. Fomicheva, N.V. (2019), “Refusal of inheritance in bankruptcy of a citizen: search for a balance of interests of the heir and the creditor”, Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy, no. 5 (130), pp. 148–151.
4. Medvetskaya, O.A. (2014), “The civil-law mechanism of the refusal of inheritance”, Proceedings of Southwest State University. The series: History and Law, no. 4, pp. 53–57.
5. Popova, L.I. (2015), “Disclaimer of inheritance in Russian civil legislation”, The Rule of Law, no. 2 (22), pp. 84–89.
6. Serikova, V.A. (2020), “Renunciation of inheritance: subjects of theory and legal precedents”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Juridical Academy, no. 3 (63), pp. 84–89.
7. Shibayeva, E.N. (2020), “Misuse of right under inheritance disclaimer”, The Modern Lawyer, no. 3 (32), pp. 59–68.
8. Shishmareva, T.P. (2021), “About the problem of conflictability of inheritance refusal deals during insolvency procedure in Russia and Germany”, Tomsk State University Journal of Law, no. 41, pp. 193–203.
9. Sizina, O.S. (2016), “Refusal to accept the inheritance by an insolvent heir”, Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, no. 6, pp. 165–168.
Review
For citations:
Kasatkin D.M. Refusal of inheritance as a form of abuse of right. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2025;(1):116-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2025-1-116-125