Sustainability of macroeconomic dynamics. System of indicators and assessment technique

 Within the framework of integration formations, various countries show excellent macroeconomic dynamics, which in theory should be determined by the form of integration, economic union, but also depends on many other factors and conditions associated with a particular country. Thus, the standard comparison of the dynamics according to the indicators chosen for that becomes insufficient, because of difference in the quality of that dynamics which revealng is useful from the point of view of the further development of the economic Union of countries. Thereby the purpose of the study is the formation and application of a methodology for assessing the stability of macroeconomic dynamics, measured by the rate of GDP growth using the example of the Eurasian Economic Union countries. The research methodology is an empirical and structural analysis, a method for constructing phase portraits by F. Takens, which allows defining the degree of stability of dynamics on a selected time interval by the properties of an attractor. The method is a step in the algorithm of the proposed methodology for assessing the stability of macroeconomic dynamics. In addition, the author proposes the minimum necessary system of indicators required to characterize the development of the countries – members of the Eurasian Economic Union. The result of the study in the applied sense was an assessment of the stability of macroeconomic dynamics by the GDP growth rate of the Eurasian Union countries, a comparative analysis of the dynamics. The use of the sustainability assessment methodology allows it to be included in the classic version of the macroeconomic analysis of economic development, having obtained conclusions regarding the sustainability of growth, with the prospect of determining the factors that ensure such dynamics, as well as the economic policy instruments that can affect the dynamics of GDP by its components and sectors in order to improve the sustainability of growth. of the countries of the Eurasian Union, only Kazakhstan shows a positive growth rate over the entire time interval, although its fluctuations are quite significant. The assessment of stability naturally leads to the elucidation of the reasons for the differences in that parameter of dynamics, which is a promising scientific problem that requires its solution. 

1. Ageev, A.I. (2019), “Russia in world global processes and its presence in international organizations”, Muzhskaya rabota, no. 70, pp. 15–21.

2. Ageev, A.I., Loginov, E.L. and Zanuzdannyi, E.N, (2015), “Eurasian Economic Union. The need for a new contour of strategic management”, Economic strategies, no. 4, pp. 28–36.

3. Bayramov, V, Breban, D. and Mukhtarov, E. (2019), “Economic effects estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of regional linear regression”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, no. 52 (3), pp. 209–225.

4. Broеr, H.W., Dumortier, F., van Strien, S.J. and Takens, F. (2003), Struktury v dinamike. Konechnomernye determinirovannye sistemy [Structures in dynamics. Finite dimensional deterministic studies], Institut komp’yuternykh issledovanii, Moscow, Russia.

5. Galiakberov, A. and Abdullin, A. (2014), “Theory and practice of regional integration based on the EurAsEC model (Russian point of view)”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 5 (2), pp. 116–121.

6. Glazunova, V.V. (2020a), “Comparative analysis of the structural dynamics in the economy of some countries and its stability”, Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI), Series: socio-economic sciences, no. 13 (3), pp. 27–37.

7. Glazunova, V.V. (2020b), “The method of phase portraits in assessing the dynamics stability in economic systems”, Analiz, modelirovanie, upravlenie, razvitie sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: XIV Vserossiiskaya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem shkola-simpozium: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Analysis, modeling, management, development of socio-economic systems. XIV All-Russian school-symposium with international participation. Collection of scientific works], KSU, Simferopol, pp. 107–108.

8. Glazunova, V.V. (2019), “Comparative analysis of the stability of the economic dynamics in some countries”, Sila sistem, no. 4 (13), pp. 24–33.

9. Gurova, I.P., Platonova, I.N. and Maksakova, M.A. (2018), “The Level of Trade Integration in the Eurasian Economic Union”, Studies on Russian Economic Development, vol. 29, pp. 447–453.

10. Hale, H.E. (2010), “Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of Putin’s Russia”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 1 (1), pp. 33–41.

11. Hartwell, C.A. (2013), “A Eurasian (or a Soviet) Union? Consequences of further economic integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States”, Business Horizons, no. 56 (4), pp. 411–420.

12. Khitakhunov, A., Mukhamediev, B., and Pomfret, R. (2017), “Eurasian Economic Union. Present and future perspectives”, Economic Change and Restructuring, vol. 50, pp. 59–77.

13. Malinetskii, G.G., Potapov, A.B. and Podlazov, A.V. (2015), Nelineinaya dinamika: Podhodi, rezultati, nadezhdi [Nonlinear Dynamics. Approaches, Results, Expectations], Moscow, Russia.

14. Mostafa, G. (2013), “The concept of ‘Eurasia’. Kazakhstan’s Eurasian policy and its implications”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 4 (2), pp. 160–170.

15. Mostafa, G. and Mahmood, M. (2018), “Eurasian Economic Union. Evolution, challenges and possible future directions”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 9 (2), pp. 163–172.

16. Pak, o. (2019), “The impact of state ownership and business models on bank stability: Empirical evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 71. pp. 161–175.

17. Patalakh, A. (2018), “Economic or Geopolitical? Explaining the Motives and Expectations of the Eurasian Economic Union’s Member States”, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, no. 11, pp. 31–48.

18. Sukharev, o.S. (2020), “The structure of economic growth in the countries of the Eurasian Union”, Economic strategies, no. 2, pp. 112–123.

19. Sukharev, o.S. (2016), Ekonomika global’nogo ekstsessa [The economy of global kurtosis], Lenand, Moscow, Russia.