Functions of smart city as ecosystem
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-3-146-158
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to substantiate the fact that a “smart city” can be considered as an ecosystem, but in practice it turns out to be its integral part, albeit a very signifcant one, as well as to analyze the main functions of the development of a modern urban economy built on the “smart city” project. The research methodology is represented by the theory of the urban and ecosystem development, biological analogies used in economics, comparative and taxonomic analysis.
As a result of the study, it is shown that a “smart city” can permeate the entire urban economy, but the latter is much wider, which allows using the concept of ecosystems in describing its development. There are the smart city main characteristics in terms of the following parameters: purpose, scope, functions, efciency, rules, development model, ways to improve. Models for the development of a smart city are identifed depending on the expansion, narrowing or invariance of the boundaries of urban space.
The article carries out a taxonomy of the basic functions of an ecosystem and a smart city with a demonstration that the concept of an ecosystem known in biology can be applied in economic analysis with signifcant limiting conditions, and the difference in the functions of typical ecosystems and, for example, a “smart city” increases the signifcance of those restrictions. with such an application. “Smart City” with its functions ensures the development of the information and communication technologies, ecology, quality of life, social functions and urban logistics. In order to maintain the level of “smartness” of the city, it is required to reduce the level of dysfunctions. It is those basic elements that form the directions for the development of the “smart city” project, that are determined by the amount of resources, and the initial technological, intellectual potential of each city.
About the Author
O. S. SukharevRussian Federation
Oleg S. Sukharev, Dr. of Sci. (Economics), professo
bld. 32, Nakhimovskii Avenue, Moscow, 117218
References
1. Azis, I.J. (2020), “Regional Development and Noneconomic Factors”, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2nd ed., pp. 269-274.
2. Barr, S., Lampkin S., Dawkins, L. and Williamson, D. (2021), “Smart cities and behavioral change: (Un)sustainable mobilities in the neo-liberal city”, Geoforum, vol. 125, pp. 140-149.
3. Becker, S.O., Egger, P.H. and Ehrlich, M. (2018), “Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989–2013”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 69, pp. 143–152.
4. Chu, Z., Cheng, M. and Yu, N.N. (2021), “A smart city is a less polluted city”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 172, pp. 121037.
5. Janani, R.P., Renuka, K., Aruna, A. and Lakshmi Narayanan, K. (2021), “IoT in Smart Cities: A Contemporary Survey”, Global Transitions Proceedings, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 187–193.
6. Ji, J., Liang, X. and Ma, G. (2021), “Political hierarchy and regional economic development: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity in China”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 194, pp. 104352.
7. Kashef, M., Visvizi, A. and Troisie, O. (2021), “Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 124, pp. 106923.
8. Kocaa, G., Egilmez, O. and Akcakaya, O. (2021), “Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique”, Telematics and Informatics, vol. 62, pp. 101625.
9. Leone, V., Tedim, F. and Xanthopoulos, G. (2020), “11 – Fire Smart Territory as an innovative approach to wildfre risk reduction”, Extreme Wildfre Events and Disasters: Root Causes and New Management Strategies, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 201-215.
10. Mills, D., Pudney, S., Pevcin, P. and Dvorak, J. (2022), Evidence-Based Public Policy Decision-Making in Smart Cities: Does Extant Theory Support Achievement of City Sustainability Objectives?, Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010003.
11. Navío-Marco, J., Rodrigo-Moya, B. and Gerli, P. (2020), “The rising importance of the “Smart territory” concept: defnition and implications”, Land Use Policy, vol. 99, pp. 105003.
12. Popov, E.V. (2020), Ekonotronika [Econotronics], Izd-vo Tyumenskogo gos. un-ta, Tyumen, Russia.
13. Sukharev, O.S. (2022), “Smart City and Territory. Overcoming Structural Gap”, Bulletin of the IE RAS, no. 1. pp. 68-84.
14. Sun, P., Zhou L., Gea, D., Lu X., Sun, D., Lu M., Qiaoa, W. (2021), “How does spatial governance drive rural development in China’s farming areas?”, Habitat International, vol. 109, pp. 102320.
15. Wang, L., Acheampong, R.A. and He, S. (2020), “High-speed rail network development effects on the growth and spatial dynamics of knowledge-intensive economy in major cities of China”, Cities, vol. 105, pp. 102772.
16. Zhao, F., Fashola, O.I., Olarewaju, T. I. and Onwumere, I. (2021), “Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review”, Cities, vol. 119, pp. 103406.
Review
For citations:
Sukharev O.S. Functions of smart city as ecosystem. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2022;(3 ч. 2):146-158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-3-146-158