Achieving technological sovereignty of high-tech sectors of the Russian economy: state and prospects
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-4-74-92
Abstract
The article deals with the current topic of achieving technological sovereignty and technological independence of high-tech industries in the Russian Federation. It considers the notion and economic concept of the import substitution policy. Also following the study of scientific literature and foreign practice it identifies and characterizes, various types of import-substituting strategies . The analysis of foreign practice in the field of import substitution, resulted in identifying important tools in that area: stimulating and increasing investment, supporting especially important industries (providing independence in the technological sphere) through the use of a set of tax and other measures.
It is shown that import-substituting strategies should be supplemented by a set of industrial and innovation policies, as well as a meso-level development strategy. The author considers various points of view on achieving import independence in high-tech industries as well as the potential, main issues, tasks and directions for achieving technological sovereignty by the example of the electronic industry of the Russian Federation. The main principles of a new approach to managing the development of high-tech industrial complexes in order to achieve technological sovereignty are identified: a systematic approach, priority for the development of meso-level innovation ecosystems, consolidation of efforts in critical (priority) and promising areas for achieving technological sovereignty, selected taking into account the principle of optimality, focus on innovative activity and entrepreneurship, orienting perspective planning.
About the Author
Yu. V. Daneikin
Yaroslav the Wise Novgorod State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yurii V. Daneikin, Cand. of Sci. (Physics and Mathematics)
bld. 41, Bolshaya St. Petersburg Street, Veliky Novgorod, 173003
References
1. Allen, R. (2017), “Globalʹnaya ekonomicheskaya istoriya: kratkoe vvedenie [Global Economic History. A Brief Introduction], Izd-vo In-ta Gaidara, Moscow, Russia.
2. Bodrunov, S.D. (2015), Teoriya i praktika importozameshcheniya: uroki i problemy [Theory and practice of import substitution. Lessons and issues], Monograph, INIR im. S.Yu. Vitte, St. Petersburg, Russia.
3. Borisov, V.N. and Pochukaeva, O.V. (2015), “Innovative machine engineering as a factor of developing import substitution”, Studies of Russian Economic Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 225-232.
4. Couture, S. and Toupin, S. (2020), “What does the notion of ‘sovereignty’ mean when referring to the digital world?”, International Organisations Research Journal, no. 15 (4), pp. 48-69, DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-03.
5. Faltsman, V.K. (2015), “Forcing import substitutions in a new geopolitical situation”, Studies on Russian Economic Development, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15-21.
6. Fomin, D.A. (2022), “Scientific and technological progress. An investment component”, Terra Economicus, no. 20 (1), pp. 52-64, DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-1-52-64.
7. Fomin, D.A. and Khanin, G.I. (2017), “The dynamics of capital assets in the economy of the Russian Federation over the post-Soviet period (1992-2015)”, Studies on Russian Economic Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 373-383.
8. Khanin, G.I. and Fomin D.A. (2017), “Post-Soviet Society and Russian Macroeconomic Statistics”, Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, no. 26 (2), pp. 62-81.
9. Kirbitova, S.V. and Nikitina, K.K. (2018), “Import substitution policy in theory and practice”, Customs Policy of Russia in the Far East, no. 4 (85), pp. 21-31, DOI: 10.17238/ISSN1815-0683.2018.4.21.
10. Krivenko, N.V. and Epaneshnikova, D.S. (2020), “Import substitution as a stabilization tool for the socio-economic development of regions”, Economy of Regions, no. 16 (3), pp. 765-778, DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-7.
11. Kurochkina, A.A. and Zhil’chuk, L.B. (2021), “Import substitution as a key direction of economic stabilization in the Russian Federation”, Global Scientific Potential, no. 11 (128), pp. 182-188.
12. Luchinin, V.V. (2018), “Micro- and nanosystems industry. From import substitution to technological sovereignty”, Nanoindustry, no. 11 (6–85), pp. 450-461, DOI: 10.22184/1993-8578.2018.11.5.450.461.
13. Simanovskaya, M.L. and Silant’eva, E.S. (2016),“Import substitution in the aspect of economic theories”, Public Administration E-Journal, no. 56, pp. 198-219.
14. Sokolova, O.Yu., Kolotyrin, E.A. and Skvortsova, V.A. (2017), “Import substitution as an industrial policy strategy”, University Proceedings. Volga region. Social Sciences, no. 1 (41), pp. 130-139, DOI: 10.21685/2072-3016-2017-1-13.
15. Tsukerman, V.A. and Kozlov, A.A. (2017), “On the import substitution policy in the industrial production of the North and the Arctic”, Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka, no. 1, pp. 113-121.
Review
For citations:
Daneikin Yu.V. Achieving technological sovereignty of high-tech sectors of the Russian economy: state and prospects. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2022;(4):74-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-4-74-92
Views:
343
Email this article 