Development of a methodology for assessing the system of cross-border relations
https://doi.org/10.28995/3033-7216-2025-4-89-106
Abstract
The article addresses the lack of a comprehensive methodology for assessing the state of border relations in the Russian Federation. The author emphasizes the strategic significance of border territories in context of national and regional development, highlighting their unique geopolitical and socio-economic position. Based on the analysis of current governmental pro- grams and international practices, a unified methodology for quantitative and qualitative assessment of cross-border interactions is proposed. The study focuses on developing an indicator system that reflects political, economic, social, and environmental aspects, alongside an analytical algorithm for data interpretation. Special attention is given to the adaptability of the methodology to various regional contexts, including Russia’s new territories. The presented approach incorporates mathematical models, statistical data processing, and the index system for ranking regions by their development and resilience. The results can be applied to improve management efficiency, evaluate programmatic funding, and forecast socio-economic impacts of cross-border processes.
About the Authors
L. S. Leonteva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lydia S. Leonteva, Dr. of Sci. (Economics), professor
bld. 1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
I. A. Golubtsov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Golubtsov – Ph.D. Candidate
bld. 1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Belanova, N.N., Chirkunova, E.K. and Kornilova, A.D. (2019), “Analysis of the effectiveness and efficiency of the state program in industry”, Russian Economics online-journal, no. 2, 8 p.
2. Borodin, A.I., Kiseleva, N.N. and Shash, N.N. (2011), “Assessment of the regional environmental programs efficiency”, Financial Journal, no. 4, pp. 49-62.
3. Breusova, A.G. (2015), “Evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs”, Herald of Omsk University. Series: Economics, no. 2, pp. 128-136.
4. Bugaeva, T.N. (2024), “Quality control and effectiveness assessment of state programs”, Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banks, Investments, no. 3 (68), pp. 34-43.
5. Bychaev, A.G. (2022), “Comparative analysis of the use of correlation coefficients”, Nauchnoe obespechenie razvitiya APK v usloviyakh importozameshcheniya: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konf [Scientific support for the development of agroindustrial complex in the conditions of import substitution, Collection of scientific papers based on the proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference], pp. 89-93.
6. Gilmour, J.B. (2007), “Implementing OMB’s Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-40.
7. Gusev, M.A. (2016), “Comparison of methods for assessing the effectiveness of state programs in the subjects of the Russian Federation (Case study of the Tyumen region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug)”, Metodologiya ustoichivogo ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya v usloviyakh novoi industrializatsii: Sb. trudov Mezhdunar. konf. [Methodology of sustainable economic development in the conditions of new industrialization. Proceedings of the International Conference], Simferopol, Russia, pp. 355-360.
8. Komarova, A.V. (2014), “South Korea experience to improve assessment methodologies of state programs effectiveness”, Perspectives of Science, no. 10 (61), pp. 114-117.
9. Palash, S.V. (2018), “Economic effects of the implementation of the state program for the development of industry”, Sistemnyi analiz v ehkonomike: Cb. trudov V Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.-biennale [System analysis in economics. Proceedings of the V International scientific and practical conference-biennale], Moscow, Russia, pp. 119-122.
10. Shash, N.N. (2011), “Program-based budget formation and evaluation of budget program efficiency”, Financial Journal, no. 2, pp. 55-64.
11. Terekhov, A.G., Tikhonov, R.M. and Serebryannikov, V.V. (2008), Audit ehffektivnosti proektov, programm, izobretenii i otkrytii: Novometriya, kvalimetriya i sertifikatsiya produktsii i proizvodstv [Audit of the efficiency of projects, programs, inventions and discoveries], Ekonomika, Moscow, Russia.
12. Terentyeva, I.V. (2013), “Methodology of the municipal programs ranking for the purposes of budget financing”, Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS, no. 4, pp. 55-65.
13. Volkov, D.G. (2014), “Foreign experience analysis and the development of public service satisfaction methodology in Russia”, Practical Marketing, no. 9 (21), pp. 17-22.
14. Yusupov, R.M. (2014), “Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of government programs”, Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal, no. 4 (64), pp. 40-42.
15. Zverev, K.L. (2018), “Improvement in the management process of state programs of the subjects of the Russian Federation (municipal programs) by developing a unified methodology for assessing the effectiveness of their implementation”, Byulleten’ sovremenykh issledovanii, no. 5.4 (20), pp. 152-154.
Review
For citations:
Leonteva L.S., Golubtsov I.A. Development of a methodology for assessing the system of cross-border relations. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2025;(4):89-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/3033-7216-2025-4-89-106
Views:
8
JATS XML
Email this article 