Differentiation of works and services as objects of civil rights according to the criterion of the result materialization
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-2-141-149
Abstract
The article considers controversial issues of the legal regime of service and work as objects of civil rights, s the value of the criterion of the result materialization when correlating the categories of “work” and “service”.
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out within the framework of the project “Educational and methodological support for the activities of Slavic universities” (state assignment, passport No. 2881-21).
About the Author
Z. I. Ismoilova
Russian-Tajik (Slavic) University
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Zainura I. Ismoilova, Cand. of Sci. (Law), associate professor
bld. 30, M. Tursunzode Street, Dushanbe, 734000
References
1. Abdullaeva, R.A. (2010), Issues of legal regulation of the audit activity in the Republic of Tajikistan, Ph.D. (Law) Abstract, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan.
2. Abova, T.E. and Kabalkin, A.Yu. (eds.) (2002), Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti vtoroi [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation], vol. 1, Moscow, Russia.
3. Atakueva, M.T. (2012), “Issues of the relationship between the concepts of ‘work’ and ‘services’”, Business in law, no. 4. pp. 29–31.
4. Belov, V.A. (2011), Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii chasti vtoroi i tret’ei [The practice of applying the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, parts two and three], Moscow, Russia.
5. Borisov, B.A. (1997), Uslugi. Pravovoi rezhim realizatsii [Services. Legal regime of implementation], Filin, Moscow, Russia.
6. Braginskii, M.I. and Vitryanskii, V.V. (2008), Dogovornoe pravo. Obshchie polozheniya [Contract law. General provisions], Statut, Moscow, Russia.
7. Drozdova, A.V. (2003), “The concept and content of a service as an object of civil rights”, Siberian law herald, no. 1, pp. 39–44.
8. Fartkhutdinov, Ya.F. (1983), Zakonodatel’stvo i sudebnaya praktika po nekotorym vidam bytovogo obsluzhivaniya [Legislation and judicial practice on certain types of consumer services], Izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo universiteta, Kazan, Russia.
9. Golovkina, D.V. (2017), “On the issue of delimiting the concepts of ‘work’ and ‘service’” in contractual relations”, Bulletin of Prikamsky Social Institute, no. 3 (78), рр. 36–39.
10. Inshakova, A.O. and Kagalnitskova, N.V. (2019), “Theoretical and applied approaches to qualification of civil relations on rendering services”, Legal Concept, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 90–93.
11. Kalmykov, Yu.Kh. (1998), K ponyatiyu obyazatel’stv po okazaniyu uslug v grazhdanskom prave: Izbrannye trudy. Stat’i. Vystupleniya [On the concept of obligations to provide services in civil law. Selected works. Articles. Reports.], Statut, Moscow, Russia.
12. Martirosova, L.E. (2016), “Provision of services as an object of civil rights”, International scientific journal INNOVATION SCIENCE, no. 7–8. pp. 109–111.
13. Puchkov, E.A. (2008), “Issues of legal regulation of a paid services agreement”, Rossiiskaya Yustitsiya, no. 5, рр. 10–12.
14. Sergeev, A.P. and Tolstoi Yu.K. (eds.) (2005), Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law], Text-book in 3 vols., vol. 1, TK Velbi, Prospekt, Moscow, Russia.
15. Zaitseva, N.V. (2004), Contract for the provision of medical services, Ph.D. (Law) Thesis, Volgograd, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Ismoilova Z.I. Differentiation of works and services as objects of civil rights according to the criterion of the result materialization. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2022;(2):141-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2022-2-141-149
Views:
179
Email this article 